Regulatory & Geography

HealthOS ICU is not registered as standalone software as a medical device (SaMD).

Regulatory positioning

The positioning — based on IMDRF SaMD Key Definitions and MDCG 2019-11 — is software in a medical device / active control system accessory:

  • Requires a medical device (bedside monitor) as host
  • Does not independently perform a medical purpose without the host device
  • Supervisory mode by default; write-path only with clinician confirmation

This positioning reduces regulatory burden at entry and allows phased market entry aligned with clinical validation milestones.

In summary, the same three sources — on the regulatory page →

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 has been in force since August 2024. For medical-device manufacturers and for HealthOS ICU partners on the European market, it sets a frame that must be met.

Provision What it establishes Source
Article 3(1), recital 12 Definition of an AI system; systems based on rules defined solely by humans fall outside the definition EUR-Lex →
Commission guidelines on the AI-system definition (February 2025) How to apply the Article 3(1) definition European Commission →
Article 6(1), Annex I An AI system that is a product or a safety component of a product under Annex I legislation (which includes the 2017/745 medical devices regulation) subject to mandatory third-party conformity assessment is high-risk EUR-Lex →
Articles 9–15 Obligations of a high-risk-system provider: risk management, data and data governance, technical documentation, record-keeping, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity EUR-Lex →
Article 113 Application timeline: for Annex I high-risk systems — August 2027 per the regulation’s text; as of this writing the European Commission has proposed a postponement as part of the digital-legislation simplification package — check the current text EUR-Lex →

The evidence the regulation requires from a high-risk system — a log of every command with its outcome, rule version, and confirming person; human confirmation for equipment-control commands; technical documentation assembled from evidence-of-fact receipts — HealthOS ICU produces as a product of normal operation.

Qualifying the platform’s recommendation-computation method under the Article 3(1) definition is a matter for regulatory assessment in each market-entry jurisdiction.

Applicable standards

Standard Role Status
ISO 13485:2016 QMS design controls Partial
ISO 14971:2019 Risk management Planned
IEC 62304 Software lifecycle Partial
IMDRF SaMD QMS QMS vocabulary Reference only
FDA CDS guidance Non-device CDS basis Partial

Detailed evidence — in the conformance matrix →

Traceability as a Product Property

Medical regulation — ISO 14971, IEC 62304 — is built around traceability. In the architecture of HealthOS ICU, traceability is not a separate line of work, — it is a product property: knowledge changes only through a governed path, execution produces evidence bound to a version of that knowledge, and audit requests are answered with files.

The practical consequence for a regulatory programme: the dossier is assembled from evidence that already exists, rather than reconstructed after the fact. Reconstruction after the fact is a known cause of regulatory programmes failing: by the time you need to prove what was executing on a given day, there is nothing left to prove it with.

Market Entry Sequence

South Africa (SAHPRA)
First target market. SAHPRA establishment licensing + clinical evaluation path. Two anchor clinical partner institutions identified. Target: first deployment under clinical evaluation within 18 months.

Botswana (BoMRA)
Secondary Sub-Saharan Africa entry following South Africa clearance. BoMRA pathway compatible with SAHPRA precedent.

Brazil, Malaysia, Kenya

  • Brazil: ANVISA RDC 657/2022 — Class II medical software path
  • Malaysia: NPRA Class B/C medical device registration
  • Kenya: PPB Class B medical device

India (CDSCO)
CDSCO Class B/C medical device; largest long-term volume opportunity.

EU/US — Monitoring
Evidence from the South African clinical evaluation may be used in CE/FDA submissions. The EU AI Act applies to manufacturing partners on the European market regardless of the platform’s own deployment geography.


Documents

Regulatory & Geography → · Conformance Statements →

Discuss a regulatory partnership in your jurisdiction. Contact for regulatory partnership →